<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: punypng now supports Dirty Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency</link>
	<description>A design blog by those of us with day jobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Any compression numbers for Dirty Transparency over a larger image bank? And what about computing the average as the average of the individual compression ratios?

I mean, when computing the Average of the individual compression ratios on the actual image bank, the results are 35% vs 32% in favor of Dirty Transparency. So, the benefits are only 3% in this case (instead of 12%).

The significant difference in the average results depending on the average calculation method (12% vs 3%) comes from the fact that, with the method you used for computing the average, the bigger the file is, the bigger its impact on the overall average. And, since the larger file (by far) is the only one having a compression rate &gt; 6% when compared to &#039;No Dirty Tr&#039; (i.e. 43%-7%=36%), it has a big impact on the overall average.... However, when computing the average of the individual compression results, each file has the same weight in the average.

IMO, both methods for computing the average are good but they give different information... However, I was wondering what are the benefits of Dirty Transparency over a large image bank when using both average calculation methods.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any compression numbers for Dirty Transparency over a larger image bank? And what about computing the average as the average of the individual compression ratios?</p>
<p>I mean, when computing the Average of the individual compression ratios on the actual image bank, the results are 35% vs 32% in favor of Dirty Transparency. So, the benefits are only 3% in this case (instead of 12%).</p>
<p>The significant difference in the average results depending on the average calculation method (12% vs 3%) comes from the fact that, with the method you used for computing the average, the bigger the file is, the bigger its impact on the overall average. And, since the larger file (by far) is the only one having a compression rate &gt; 6% when compared to &#8216;No Dirty Tr&#8217; (i.e. 43%-7%=36%), it has a big impact on the overall average&#8230;. However, when computing the average of the individual compression results, each file has the same weight in the average.</p>
<p>IMO, both methods for computing the average are good but they give different information&#8230; However, I was wondering what are the benefits of Dirty Transparency over a large image bank when using both average calculation methods.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magali</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Magali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article. it&#039;s very impressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article. it&#8217;s very impressive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-318</guid>
		<description>just fyi - all my (normal) gif images are now a one colored png - is puny broken?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just fyi &#8211; all my (normal) gif images are now a one colored png &#8211; is puny broken?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-168</guid>
		<description>@Kim: We have a private beta for our API that launched last weekend.  Joost de Valk is helping me out by working on a Wordpress plugin for the API.  Let me know if you want access to the beta API, and I can set you up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kim: We have a private beta for our API that launched last weekend.  Joost de Valk is helping me out by working on a WordPress plugin for the API.  Let me know if you want access to the beta API, and I can set you up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Steinhaug</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Steinhaug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Great tool, or should I say great proof of concept... Will this tool be for sale, licensing, API? I cannot simply upload images manually either...  For bloggers that wants to crunch that ekstra KB this is a great tool, however as a bonus feature in a gallery or CMS how can this be of any benefit at all?

Dont missunderstand me, great tool, however I just can&#039;t see how I can benefit from it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tool, or should I say great proof of concept&#8230; Will this tool be for sale, licensing, API? I cannot simply upload images manually either&#8230;  For bloggers that wants to crunch that ekstra KB this is a great tool, however as a bonus feature in a gallery or CMS how can this be of any benefit at all?</p>
<p>Dont missunderstand me, great tool, however I just can&#8217;t see how I can benefit from it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a Firefox Plugin that would use your service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a Firefox Plugin that would use your service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-111</guid>
		<description>@alex: I&#039;m looking into a non-flash support as well.  Stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex: I&#8217;m looking into a non-flash support as well.  Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squishing the Last Drops from Your PNGs</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Squishing the Last Drops from Your PNGs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] problem. Happily the smart folk at GracePoint After Five have constructed a free online PNG compression tool called PunyPNG that seamlessly incorporates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem. Happily the smart folk at GracePoint After Five have constructed a free online PNG compression tool called PunyPNG that seamlessly incorporates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garmahis</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garmahis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Check out ultimate guide &lt;a href=&quot;http://garmahis.com/tutorials/how-to-optimize-images-for-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Optimize Images for Web&lt;/a&gt; with all tools and techniques for PNG, JPEG and GIF optimization in one place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out ultimate guide <a href="http://garmahis.com/tutorials/how-to-optimize-images-for-web/" rel="nofollow">How to Optimize Images for Web</a> with all tools and techniques for PNG, JPEG and GIF optimization in one place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Norcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/punypng-now-supports-dirty-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Norcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gracepointafterfive.com/?p=117#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Hi, unfortunately this service doesn&#039;t work behind a proxy owing to limitations in the Flash player&#039;s compatibility with proxies. For example see this thread at SWFUpload&#039;s forum:

http://swfupload.org/forum/generaldiscussion/184

Any chance of offering a form-based uploader as a fallback? Otherwise it&#039;s not usable to us in a corporate environment at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, unfortunately this service doesn&#8217;t work behind a proxy owing to limitations in the Flash player&#8217;s compatibility with proxies. For example see this thread at SWFUpload&#8217;s forum:</p>
<p><a href="http://swfupload.org/forum/generaldiscussion/184" rel="nofollow">http://swfupload.org/forum/generaldiscussion/184</a></p>
<p>Any chance of offering a form-based uploader as a fallback? Otherwise it&#8217;s not usable to us in a corporate environment at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
